AP United States History 2025 Free-Response Questions Set 1 - Expert Solution Guide

Welcome to the most comprehensive solution guide for the AP US History 2025 FRQ Set 1. This expert resource provides detailed, step-by-step solutions for all free-response questions including Short Answer Questions (SAQs), the Document-Based Question (DBQ), and Long Essay Questions (LEQs). Whether you're a student preparing for the exam or an educator seeking model answers, this guide offers historically defensible responses aligned with College Board scoring rubrics.

📚 Master APUSH with Complete Study Resources

Access comprehensive study notes, interactive flashcards, and practice quizzes for all 9 units

Explore AP U.S. History Study Hub

📊 AP US History FRQ 2025 Set 1 Overview

The AP United States History exam's free-response section accounts for 60% of your total exam score, making it crucial for earning a high score. This 2025 Set 1 contains carefully designed questions that assess your ability to think historically, analyze sources, and construct coherent arguments using evidence.

Section Breakdown & Scoring

Section I, Part B
Short Answer Questions

Time: 40 minutes
Questions: 3 SAQs (mandatory Q1-2, choice of Q3 or Q4)
Points: 9 points total (3 points each)
Weight: 20% of exam score

Section II
Document-Based Question

Time: 60 minutes (15 min reading + 45 min writing)
Documents: 7 documents
Points: 7 points
Weight: 25% of exam score

Section II
Long Essay Question

Time: 40 minutes
Choice: Select 1 of 3 prompts
Points: 6 points
Weight: 15% of exam score

✍️ Short Answer Questions (SAQs) - Complete Solutions

Short Answer Questions test your ability to analyze sources, compare historical interpretations, and demonstrate knowledge of specific time periods. Each question is worth 3 points with points earned independently for parts A, B, and C. You must use complete sentences—bullet points or outlines alone are not acceptable.

Question 1: Historical Interpretations

📖 Secondary Source Analysis ⏱️ 13 minutes 📊 3 points

Question Context

This question presents two contrasting historical interpretations of early United States democracy from historians Sean Wilentz (2005) and Terry Bouton (2007). Wilentz argues that American democracy expanded significantly after the Revolution, while Bouton contends that elites maintained control despite democratic rhetoric.

📌 Part A (1 point)

Prompt: Briefly describe ONE major difference between Wilentz's and Bouton's historical interpretations of early United States politics.

💡 Strategy: Focus on the central disagreement—Wilentz sees democratic expansion while Bouton sees elite control. Explicitly contrast their views in one or two sentences.

Sample Acceptable Responses:

Answer 1: Wilentz claims that early United States politics proved more egalitarian than the Founders had intended, with previously excluded portions of the people becoming governors, while Bouton argues that elite men from many states created a new national government specifically designed as a stronger barrier against democracy and that ordinary people remained unable to mobilize effectively for change.

Answer 2: Wilentz argues that the influence of the Federalists on early United States politics diminished significantly after the Election of 1800 when Jeffersonian ascendency opened up the political system, whereas Bouton argues that although the Federalists fell politically, the system they created to check democracy lasted and most Democratic-Republican leaders were content to leave Federalist barriers to democracy in place.

Answer 3: The first source argues that the American Revolution's outcome was more egalitarian than expected and that the Jeffersonian ascendency beat back the Federalists and opened the political system, while the second source argues that elites created barriers against democracy that proved to be an enduring victory even after the Federalists' political defeat.

⚠️ Common Pitfall: Don't simply describe each historian's view separately. You must explicitly COMPARE them by showing how they differ on the same issue (democratic expansion vs. elite entrenchment).

📌 Part B (1 point)

Prompt: Briefly explain how ONE event or development from 1789 to 1820 not directly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Wilentz's argument about early United States politics.

💡 Strategy: Choose evidence that demonstrates democratic expansion, popular participation, or increasing equality. Explain HOW it supports Wilentz's view that democracy grew.

Sample Acceptable Responses:

Answer 1: The passage of the Bill of Rights in 1791 shows how the new federal government established protections for individual rights and liberties, which supports Wilentz's argument that the political system was becoming more democratic and responsive to concerns about protecting citizens from government overreach.

Answer 2: The expansion of suffrage to adult white men through the elimination of property requirements for voting in many states during the early 1800s supports Wilentz's argument about the expansion of democracy in the United States, as portions of the people once largely excluded from voting were now able to participate in elections.

Answer 3: The gradual emancipation of enslaved people in northern states following the Revolution supports Wilentz's argument about growing egalitarian ideals, as these states took concrete steps to extend freedom to formerly enslaved individuals, demonstrating that revolutionary principles of equality were being applied in practice.

Additional Supporting Evidence:

Rise of the Democratic-Republican Party promoting popular sovereignty
Expansion of popular participation in politics through conventions and rallies
Growth of a free press and political pamphlets increasing public political discourse
State constitutional revisions that increased democratic features

📌 Part C (1 point)

Prompt: Briefly explain how ONE event or development from 1789 to 1820 not directly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Bouton's argument about early United States politics.

💡 Strategy: Choose evidence showing continued elite power, limitations on democracy, or barriers preventing popular participation. Explain HOW it supports Bouton's view of elite control.

Sample Acceptable Responses:

Answer 1: Supreme Court decisions like Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review, giving the judiciary—an unelected branch staffed by elite lawyers—the power to invalidate laws passed by elected representatives. This supports Bouton's argument that elites created institutional barriers insulating themselves from popular democratic influence.

Answer 2: The fact that most early political leaders and presidents, including Washington, Adams, Jefferson, and Madison, were wealthy landowners and slaveholders supports Bouton's argument that the Revolution did not result in true democratic change, as political power remained concentrated in the hands of the elite rather than being distributed to ordinary people.

Answer 3: The constitutional framework established by the Constitution, particularly the Senate (where each state gets equal representation regardless of population) and the Electoral College (which filters popular votes through electors), supports Bouton's argument that the Founders created structures specifically designed to check democracy and insulate elite decision-making from direct popular control.

Answer 4: The continuation and expansion of slavery in the United States despite the Declaration of Independence's proclamation that "all men are created equal" supports Bouton's argument about the limits of the American Revolution, as this institution fundamentally denied basic rights and humanity to millions of people while enriching elite slaveholders.

Additional Supporting Evidence:

Property requirements for office-holding remained in many states
The restriction of voting rights for women and most free Black people
The Alien and Sedition Acts limiting political opposition
Hamilton's economic policies favoring wealthy creditors and merchants
Continuation of debtor imprisonment

⚠️ Common Pitfall: Don't confuse Parts B and C! Part B needs evidence of democratic EXPANSION (supporting Wilentz), while Part C needs evidence of ELITE CONTROL or democratic LIMITS (supporting Bouton).

Question 2: Daniel Webster Speech (1830)

📄 Primary Source Analysis ⏱️ 13 minutes 📊 3 points

Question Context

This question analyzes a famous 1830 Senate speech by Daniel Webster (Massachusetts Whig) responding to Robert Y. Hayne (South Carolina Democrat). Webster emphasizes national unity, federal power to fund internal improvements, and patriotic feeling that transcends geographic boundaries—directly countering southern arguments for states' rights and limited federal authority.

📌 Part A (1 point)

Prompt: Briefly describe ONE purpose of political leaders in promoting ideas such as Webster's.

💡 Strategy: Consider Webster's rhetorical goals—why would he make these arguments? Think about the political context of rising sectionalism and debates over federal power.

Sample Acceptable Responses:

Answer 1: One purpose of political leaders like Webster in promoting ideas about national unity was to counteract the growing sectionalism that threatened to divide the nation, particularly the South's increasing advocacy for states' rights and nullification of federal laws, by fostering patriotic sentiment that emphasized common American identity over regional interests.

Answer 2: Webster hoped to inspire cooperation between different regions of the country for the common good by promoting the idea that states were united rather than separated, which would facilitate support for his Whig Party's economic agenda including federally-funded internal improvements like roads and canals connecting different parts of the nation.

Answer 3: One purpose was to establish political justification for the federal government exercising powers to fund internal improvements and other economic development projects, arguing that when power exists it should be used for the general benefit of the whole nation rather than being restricted by narrow interpretations of states' rights.

📌 Part B (1 point)

Prompt: Briefly explain ONE development from 1820 to 1848 that contributed to the political ideas debated in the speech.

💡 Strategy: Identify economic, political, or social developments that increased sectional tensions or debates about federal power. Connect the development to the issues Webster addressed.

Sample Acceptable Responses:

Answer 1: The market revolution transformed the American economy between 1820 and 1848, with the North rapidly industrializing while the South remained primarily agricultural and dependent on slave labor. These diverging economic systems intensified sectional differences and led politicians like Webster to seek ways to promote national unity through projects like internal improvements that would economically integrate the regions.

Answer 2: Political leaders debated various plans to unify the United States economy through the American System, proposed by Henry Clay, which included protective tariffs, a national bank, and federally-funded internal improvements. The debate over whether the federal government had constitutional authority to fund such projects directly contributed to the political ideas Webster was defending in his speech.

Answer 3: The Missouri Compromise (1820) and subsequent debates over slavery's expansion into new territories heightened sectional tensions between North and South. The growing antislavery movement in the North increasingly clashed with southern defense of slavery, making some politicians like Webster try to find common ground and preserve national unity through emphasis on shared patriotic values.

Answer 4: The Nullification Crisis (1828-1833) saw South Carolina claim the right to nullify federal tariff laws it considered unconstitutional, directly challenging federal authority. This crisis, which peaked around the time of Webster's speech, exemplified the sectional conflict over federal versus state power that Webster was addressing.

Additional Relevant Developments:

Debates over protective tariffs (Tariff of Abominations, 1828)
Expansion of voting rights and democratic participation
Rise of the Second Party System (Democrats vs. Whigs)
Territorial expansion westward raising questions about federal authority
The Second Great Awakening promoting reform and individualism

📌 Part C (1 point)

Prompt: Briefly explain how ONE political debate between 1848 and 1865 was similar to the debate in the speech.

💡 Strategy: Look for debates involving federal power, sectional conflict, or questions about national unity. Explicitly explain the SIMILARITY to Webster's debate.

Sample Acceptable Responses:

Answer 1: Debates over whether the federal government had the constitutional power to prohibit slavery in the territories during the 1850s were similar to Webster's discussion of federal power over internal improvements, as both centered on questions about the extent of federal authority versus states' rights and whether the Constitution granted Congress specific powers to legislate on controversial issues.

Answer 2: The continued debates over slavery expansion through the Compromise of 1850, Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854), and Bleeding Kansas were similar to Webster's era because they divided along sectional lines, with northern politicians advocating federal restriction of slavery while southern politicians claimed states' rights, paralleling the North-South divide over internal improvements and federal power.

Answer 3: Political debates surrounding the Dred Scott v. Sandford decision (1857) were similar to Webster's speech because they addressed fundamental questions about national unity and whether the United States was truly one unified nation or a loose confederation of states, with the decision inflaming sectional tensions just as the nullification debate had done.

Answer 4: Debates over secession in 1860-1861 directly paralleled Webster's speech, as southern states claimed the right to leave the Union while northern politicians like Lincoln argued that the Union was perpetual and indissoluble, echoing Webster's earlier insistence that the states were "united" rather than "separated" and that Americans should not impose "geographical limits to our patriotic feeling."

Key Connections to Identify:

Federal vs. State Power: Both eras debated constitutional limits on federal authority
Sectional Division: North-South conflict over economic/social systems
National Unity: Questions about whether US was one nation or separate states
Constitutional Interpretation: Strict vs. loose construction of federal powers

Questions 3 & 4: No-Stimulus SAQs (Choice)

📚 Knowledge-Based ⏱️ 13 minutes 📊 3 points

Important: You must choose EITHER Question 3 OR Question 4. Select the time period you know better!

Question 3: Colonial Period to Revolution (1607-1783)

📌 Part A (1 point)

Prompt: Briefly describe ONE political development in British North America from 1607 to 1753.

Sample Acceptable Responses:

Answer 1: British American colonies established self-governing institutions such as the Virginia House of Burgesses (1619) and town meetings in New England, which gave colonists experience with representative government and democratic participation that would later influence revolutionary ideals.

Answer 2: In New England colonies, political power was based on participatory town meetings where male property owners could vote on local issues and elect representatives, creating a tradition of local self-governance and direct democratic participation.

Answer 3: Many proprietary and corporate colonies gradually transitioned to direct royal government as the English Crown sought greater control over colonial affairs, yet these royal colonies still maintained representative assemblies that gave colonists significant self-governing authority.

Additional Examples: Enlightenment values encouraging self-governance principles; salutary neglect allowing colonial autonomy; conflicts with Native Americans over land; development of colonial legislatures.

📌 Part B (1 point)

Prompt: Briefly describe ONE effect of the Seven Years' War from 1754 to 1765.

Sample Acceptable Responses:

Answer 1: Following the Seven Years' War, Great Britain sought to raise revenue to pay for the expensive conflict by imposing new taxes on its North American colonies through measures like the Sugar Act (1764) and the Stamp Act (1765), which colonists viewed as violations of their rights since they had no representation in Parliament.

Answer 2: The Seven Years' War led to the end of French colonial presence in North America after France ceded Canada and its territories east of the Mississippi River to Britain in the Treaty of Paris (1763), fundamentally altering the balance of power in North America and removing a rival European power.

Answer 3: The war heightened tensions between British colonists, British officials, and Native American groups, particularly after the Proclamation of 1763 prohibited colonial settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains to avoid conflicts with Native Americans, angering colonists who wanted to expand westward.

📌 Part C (1 point)

Prompt: Briefly explain how ONE group responded to debates about the rights of British colonists from 1765 to 1783.

Sample Acceptable Responses:

Answer 1: American Patriots responded to debates about colonists' rights by organizing public protests against British policies, such as the Boston Tea Party (1773), and by establishing extra-legal bodies like the Continental Congress to coordinate colonial resistance based on the principle that British violations of their natural rights justified resistance and ultimately independence.

Answer 2: During the American Revolution, Loyalists attempted to defend the British Crown's authority against Patriots' claims, arguing that the British government had legitimate authority to govern and tax the colonies and that rebellion was illegal and treasonous.

Answer 3: British officials asserted Parliament's right to govern the colonies as it saw fit and sent soldiers to suppress the colonial rebellion, arguing that colonial claims of rights violated British sovereignty and that the colonies were subordinate to Parliamentary authority.

Question 4: Reconstruction to World War II (1865-1945)

📌 Part A (1 point)

Prompt: Briefly describe ONE political development during Reconstruction from 1865 to 1877.

Sample Acceptable Responses:

Answer 1: During Reconstruction, politicians debated whether to extend suffrage to formerly enslaved men, ultimately resulting in the ratification of the Fifteenth Amendment (1870) which prohibited states from denying voting rights based on race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

Answer 2: Congress ratified the Thirteenth Amendment in 1865, which abolished slavery throughout the United States and represented a fundamental transformation of American society and the constitutional order by eliminating an institution that had existed since the colonial period.

Answer 3: African American men were elected to political offices at local, state, and federal levels during Reconstruction, including serving in Congress and state legislatures, representing an unprecedented expansion of Black political participation and power.

Additional Examples: Congressional Reconstruction vs. Presidential Reconstruction debates; Fourteenth Amendment (citizenship and equal protection); Military Reconstruction Act; Freedmen's Bureau; Compromise of 1877.

📌 Part B (1 point)

Prompt: Briefly describe ONE effect of the end of Reconstruction from 1877 to 1900.

Sample Acceptable Responses:

Answer 1: The end of Reconstruction resulted in the passage of Jim Crow segregation laws throughout the South, which legally mandated racial segregation in public facilities, schools, and transportation, and were upheld by the Supreme Court in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), effectively nullifying many of Reconstruction's gains in racial equality.

Answer 2: The Democratic Party regained its political dominance in the South as a result of the end of Reconstruction, establishing the "Solid South" where Democrats controlled state governments and used tactics including violence, intimidation, literacy tests, and poll taxes to disenfranchise African American voters.

Answer 3: Sharecropping became the dominant agricultural system in the South as African Americans' access to land ownership decreased, trapping many formerly enslaved people and poor whites in a cycle of debt and economic dependency that resembled the economic exploitation of slavery.

📌 Part C (1 point)

Prompt: Briefly explain how ONE group responded to debates about the federal government from 1900 to 1945.

Sample Acceptable Responses:

Answer 1: Progressives responded to debates about federal government power by arguing that the federal government had authority to intervene in the economy to protect consumers and workers, leading to new regulations such as the Pure Food and Drug Act (1906), the Federal Trade Commission, and antitrust enforcement against monopolies.

Answer 2: Labor unions, particularly during the New Deal era, called for the federal government to better protect workers' rights, resulting in legislation like the National Labor Relations Act (1935) which guaranteed workers' right to organize and collectively bargain, representing a significant expansion of federal involvement in labor relations.

Answer 3: The NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) advocated for federal government action to protect the civil rights of African Americans, including anti-lynching legislation and legal challenges to segregation, arguing that the federal government had a responsibility to enforce the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments.

Additional Examples: Women's suffrage movement (19th Amendment); conservationists supporting federal protection of natural resources; Supreme Court initially limiting New Deal programs; isolationists vs. interventionists debating foreign policy.

💡 Choosing Between Q3 and Q4:

Choose Q3 if you're strong on colonial history, causes of the Revolution, and early constitutional debates
Choose Q4 if you're confident with Reconstruction, Jim Crow, Progressive Era, and New Deal policies
Consider which period you've studied more recently or have clearer examples for

📝 Document-Based Question (DBQ) - Complete Analysis

DBQ: Federal Government's Role in the Economy (1932-1980)

📄 7 Documents ⏱️ 60 minutes 📊 7 points maximum

The Prompt

"Evaluate the extent to which the role of the federal government in the United States economy changed from 1932 to 1980."

This DBQ asks you to assess the extent of change—meaning you need to evaluate HOW MUCH the federal government's economic role changed. Did it transform completely? Change significantly but with continuities? The prompt covers nearly 50 years spanning the Great Depression, New Deal, World War II, postwar prosperity, Great Society, and the rise of conservatism.

Document Overview & Analysis

📄 Document 1: Workers Council Letter (1937)

Source: Letter from women members of the Workers Council of Colored People to Harry Hopkins, WPA head administrator

Content Summary: African American women in Raleigh, NC complain about racial discrimination in WPA hiring, noting that White women were given jobs while Black women were displaced. They request investigation and relief.

Analysis for Your Essay:

Evidence of Government Role: Shows New Deal expansion of federal government into employment through WPA
Limitations: Demonstrates that federal intervention had unequal impacts across racial groups
POV/Purpose: The women wrote to Hopkins to seek federal intervention against discrimination, showing they saw the federal government as having authority and responsibility to ensure fair treatment
Historical Situation: Written during the New Deal when federal programs were growing rapidly, but Jim Crow discrimination was still pervasive in the South
Audience: Directed at federal officials who both supported New Deal expansion and needed to maintain support from southern segregationists, revealing tensions in federal policy

📄 Document 2: War Food Administration Pamphlet (1943)

Source: US War Food Administration pamphlet distributed to farmers

Content Summary: Describes federal mobilization of farm labor during WWII, including bringing workers from Mexico, Jamaica, and the Bahamas when local labor was insufficient.

Analysis for Your Essay:

Evidence of Government Role: Federal government actively managing agricultural labor supply and negotiating international labor agreements
Context: War mobilization dramatically expanded federal economic intervention
Historical Situation: WWII labor shortages as workers moved to war plants and military service, requiring unprecedented federal coordination of the economy
Audience: Farmers who needed labor, showing federal government positioning itself as solver of economic problems

📄 Document 3: Interstate Highway Exhibition Photo (1957)

Source: Federal officials viewing exhibition about Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956

Content Summary: Visual depicting the planned interstate highway system funded by federal government

Analysis for Your Essay:

Evidence of Government Role: Massive federal infrastructure investment connecting the nation
Economic Impact: Federal spending stimulating construction, facilitating commerce, enabling suburbanization
Historical Situation: Created during Cold War when the government justified infrastructure spending partly for national defense (moving troops and evacuating cities)
Purpose: The exhibition aimed to promote and explain the federal highway program to officials and the public, demonstrating government's active economic planning role

📄 Document 4: JFK State of the Union (1962)

Source: President John F. Kennedy, State of the Union address

Content Summary: Kennedy argues the nation's wealth should expand opportunities for all citizens, advocating for federal health insurance for the elderly because private insurance is too expensive and limited.

Analysis for Your Essay:

Evidence of Government Role: Liberal argument for expanding federal social programs into healthcare
Philosophy: Reflects belief that government has moral obligation to ensure citizen welfare
Historical Situation: Delivered during height of postwar liberalism when Americans had growing confidence in federal government's ability to solve social problems
Purpose: Kennedy aimed to convince Americans to support Medicare, part of his broader New Frontier agenda of expanded federal programs
Connection: This leads to Medicare/Medicaid creation in 1965 under LBJ's Great Society

📄 Document 5: Barry Goldwater Speech (1964)

Source: Barry Goldwater accepting Republican presidential nomination

Content Summary: Goldwater argues for freedom, resisting concentrations of power, keeping power with the people, maintaining free and competitive economy, and preferring government action at state/local levels.

Analysis for Your Essay:

Evidence of Government Role: Represents conservative pushback against New Deal liberalism and federal expansion
Turning Point: Signals rise of conservative movement questioning federal economic intervention
POV: Goldwater believed liberalism's expansion of federal power threatened individual freedom and created dependency
Historical Situation: Speech given as conservatives mobilized against Great Society programs and growing federal bureaucracy
Complexity: Note Goldwater lost 1964 election badly, but his ideas gained traction and influenced Reagan's 1980 victory

📄 Document 6: César Chávez Testimony (1969)

Source: César Chávez, leader of National Farm Workers Association, statement to Senate Committee

Content Summary: Chávez argues that farm workers need strong unions to achieve social justice and that unions require effective federal government support to succeed against resistant agricultural employers.

Analysis for Your Essay:

Evidence of Government Role: Labor activists advocating for federal protection of workers' rights to unionize and collectively bargain
Continuity: Shows continued calls for federal economic intervention even in late 1960s
POV: Chávez believed government support was essential for workers to gain economic power against employers
Historical Situation: Part of broader 1960s civil rights movements that encouraged Mexican-American farm workers to organize and demand federal protection
Audience: Senators who had authority to pass labor legislation protecting union organizing

📄 Document 7: Marjorie Holt Speech (1976)

Source: Marjorie S. Holt, Republican member of Congress, "The Case Against the Reckless Congress"

Content Summary: Holt argues government spending consumes too much GNP (37%), drains savings needed for private investment, and that three decades of congressional spending has led to tyranny. Advocates for state/local policy-making.

Analysis for Your Essay:

Evidence of Change: By 1970s, criticism of federal economic role had grown significantly
Context: 1970s stagflation and economic problems led many to question effectiveness of federal intervention
Historical Situation: Speech delivered during economic crisis (high inflation, unemployment, slow growth) that undermined confidence in Keynesian economic policies
Purpose: Holt aimed to convince Americans that conservative philosophy should replace liberal policies, contributing to Republican gains leading to Reagan's 1980 election
Significance: Represents intellectual foundation for Reagan Revolution's promises to reduce federal economic role

Crafting Your Thesis (1 Point)

Your thesis must be historically defensible and establish a line of reasoning. It should take a position on the EXTENT of change.

Strong Thesis Example 1: From 1932 to 1980, the federal government's role in the United States economy changed dramatically from relatively limited involvement to extensive intervention through employment programs, infrastructure projects, and social welfare initiatives during the New Deal and Great Society eras, though by the late 1970s growing economic problems and conservative criticism began to challenge this expanded role, setting the stage for a reversal in the 1980s.

Strong Thesis Example 2: Between 1932 and 1980, the federal government fundamentally transformed its economic role from passive observer to active manager through three key developments: emergency relief and employment programs during the Great Depression, massive wartime economic mobilization, and expanded social welfare programs in the postwar period, though this trend faced increasing opposition from conservatives who advocated returning economic power to states and individuals.

Strong Thesis Example 3: The period from 1932 to 1980 witnessed the rise and beginning of the decline of an interventionist federal economic role, as liberal policies expanding government programs to ensure economic security and opportunity dominated from the New Deal through the Great Society but increasingly faced conservative challenges arguing that federal intervention threatened freedom and economic growth.

⚠️ Weak Thesis Examples (Do NOT Write These):

"The federal government's role in the economy changed from 1932 to 1980." [Just restates prompt]
"The economy experienced many ups and downs during this period." [Doesn't address government's ROLE]
"The government became more involved in the economy." [Too vague, no line of reasoning]

Contextualization (1 Point)

Describe broader historical context BEFORE, DURING, or AFTER the time period that's relevant to the prompt. Must be more than a phrase.

Strong Contextualization Example 1: During the Gilded Age and Progressive Era preceding 1932, many businesses and politicians argued that government should pursue laissez-faire policies and not interfere in the economy, viewing government regulation as an infringement on economic freedom. However, the catastrophic stock market crash of 1929 and the subsequent Great Depression, which left millions unemployed and banks failing, created a crisis that challenged these assumptions and opened the door for Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal programs to dramatically expand federal economic intervention.

Strong Contextualization Example 2: The 1920s represented a period of Republican dominance and limited government economic intervention, with presidents Harding, Coolidge, and Hoover advocating for business-friendly policies and minimal federal regulation. When the stock market crashed in October 1929, setting off the Great Depression with unemployment reaching 25%, this economic catastrophe discredited laissez-faire approaches and created political conditions for unprecedented federal activism.

Using Documents as Evidence (2 Points)

1 point: Use content from 3+ documents to address the topic
2 points: Support argument using 4+ documents

Don't just quote or describe documents—USE them to SUPPORT your argument!

Using Document 1 Effectively: The expansion of federal economic programs during the New Deal represented a fundamental shift in government's role, as evidenced by Document 1, in which African American women in North Carolina appealed to the federal WPA administrator about discriminatory hiring practices. The fact that these workers looked to federal officials to address local employment issues demonstrates how the New Deal had established the federal government as a direct employer and economic actor in communities across the country, a role it had never played before 1933.

Evidence Beyond the Documents (1 Point)

Provide at least ONE specific piece of historical evidence NOT in the documents that's relevant to your argument.

Strong Evidence Examples:

New Deal Programs: Social Security Act (1935), Civilian Conservation Corps, Tennessee Valley Authority, Securities and Exchange Commission
WWII: Office of Price Administration, War Production Board, rationing
Postwar: GI Bill, Employment Act of 1946, Federal Housing Administration
Great Society: Medicare and Medicaid (1965), Economic Opportunity Act, Food Stamp Act
1970s: Creation of EPA, OSHA, stagflation crisis, energy crisis
End of Period: Ronald Reagan's 1980 campaign promising to reduce federal government size

Using Outside Evidence: Beyond the documents, the creation of Social Security in 1935 represented perhaps the most significant expansion of federal economic responsibility, as the government committed to providing retirement income for elderly Americans, fundamentally changing the relationship between citizens and the federal government by creating an ongoing obligation that continues to the present day.

Document Sourcing (1 Point)

For at least TWO documents, explain how or why the document's POV, purpose, historical situation, OR audience is relevant to your argument.

Sourcing Example 1: Document 4 demonstrates how liberal ideas in the postwar era promoted expanded government intervention, as President Kennedy's purpose in his 1962 State of the Union address was to convince Americans that the federal government had a moral obligation to provide health insurance for the elderly because private insurance had failed to adequately serve them. Kennedy's argument reflected the broader liberal consensus of the 1960s that government should actively address social problems and expand opportunities for all citizens.

Sourcing Example 2: The historical situation of Document 7 is crucial to understanding the changing attitudes toward federal economic intervention. By 1976, when Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Holt delivered her speech, the United States was experiencing stagflation—simultaneous high inflation and unemployment—which seemed to prove that the Keynesian economic policies the federal government had relied on since the New Deal were failing. This economic crisis provided conservatives like Holt with evidence to argue that federal intervention was not just ineffective but actually harmful, contributing to the rise of conservative economic philosophy that would triumph in Reagan's 1980 election.

Complexity (1 Point)

This is the hardest point to earn. Demonstrate complex understanding through:

Explaining multiple themes or perspectives
Analyzing multiple causes/effects or continuity/change
Making relevant connections within/across periods
Using all 7 documents effectively
Sourcing 4+ documents

Complexity Example: While the federal government's economic role expanded dramatically from 1932 through the 1960s through programs ranging from Social Security to Medicare, this expansion was never universally accepted, and by the 1970s economic problems gave credibility to conservative critics. However, it's significant that even as conservatives like Goldwater (Document 5) and Holt (Document 7) attacked federal economic intervention, they acknowledged that government should not "abandon the needy"—suggesting that even critics accepted some baseline level of federal economic responsibility that would have been unthinkable before the New Deal. This shows that while the trend toward expansion reversed by 1980, the fundamental transformation of federal responsibilities persisted, as even Reagan in the 1980s did not dismantle Social Security or Medicare.

📖 Long Essay Questions (LEQ) - Overview & Strategy

For the LEQ, you choose ONE of three prompts covering different time periods. Each LEQ is worth 6 points and should take approximately 40 minutes (5 minutes planning, 35 minutes writing).

LEQ Scoring Rubric (6 Points Total)

1 pt

Thesis/Claim: Historically defensible thesis establishing line of reasoning

1 pt

Contextualization: Describe broader historical context relevant to prompt

2 pts

Evidence: 1 point for 2 specific examples; 2 points for using 2+ examples to support argument

2 pts

Analysis & Reasoning: 1 point for using historical reasoning to frame argument; 2 points for demonstrating complex understanding

LEQ Option 2: Native American Adaptation (1500-1754)

Prompt: Evaluate how Native American societies adapted to the presence of European colonists in North America from 1500 to 1754.

Key Evidence to Consider:

Trade: Fur trade with Dutch, French, British; adoption of European goods (metal tools, firearms)
Diplomacy: Covenant Chain (Haudenosaunee-British alliance); playing European powers against each other
Cultural Adaptation: Some conversion to Christianity; mission settlements; métis culture
Resistance: Pueblo Revolt (1680); Metacom's/King Philip's War (1675-1676); Pequot War
Economic Changes: Shift to fur trapping; adoption of horses; participation in Atlantic economy

💡 Possible Thesis: Native American societies adapted to European colonization through diverse strategies including engaging in diplomatic alliances to maintain power, participating in trade networks to obtain valuable goods, selectively adopting aspects of European culture such as Christianity, and armed resistance when colonization threatened their autonomy, demonstrating that Native peoples were active agents who made strategic choices rather than passive victims.

LEQ Option 3: Reform Movements & Industrialization (1820-1900)

Prompt: Evaluate how different reform movements in the United States responded to industrialization from 1820 to 1900.

Key Evidence to Consider:

Labor Unions: Knights of Labor, American Federation of Labor; strikes (Haymarket, Pullman); fight for 8-hour day, better conditions
Religious Reform: Second Great Awakening inspired temperance, education reform; Social Gospel addressing urban poverty
Women's Rights: Seneca Falls Convention; suffrage movement; Jane Addams and settlement houses
Utopian Communities: Brook Farm, Oneida; attempts to create alternatives to industrial capitalism
Political Reform: Populists; muckrakers; calls for regulation of monopolies and trusts

💡 Possible Thesis: Reform movements responded to industrialization's social dislocations through both religiously-motivated moral crusades like temperance and systematic labor organizing that directly challenged corporate power, while some reformers sought to perfect capitalism through regulation and others attempted to create utopian alternatives, demonstrating that industrialization provoked diverse and sometimes contradictory reform strategies.

LEQ Option 4: US Foreign Policy (1890-1930)

Prompt: Evaluate how United States foreign policy responded to changes in the world from 1890 to 1930.

Key Evidence to Consider:

Imperialism: Spanish-American War (1898); annexation of Hawaii, Philippines, Puerto Rico; Open Door Policy in China
Latin America: Roosevelt Corollary; Dollar Diplomacy; Panama Canal; interventions in Caribbean
World War I: Neutrality to intervention; Wilson's Fourteen Points; Treaty of Versailles; League of Nations rejection
Isolationism: Refusal to join League; Washington Naval Conference; immigration restriction (National Origins Act 1924)
Economic Expansion: Growing US investments abroad; shift from debtor to creditor nation

💡 Possible Thesis: United States foreign policy from 1890 to 1930 evolved from territorial expansion and assertion of dominance in the Western Hemisphere to reluctant involvement in European conflict during World War I, followed by retreat to isolationism, reflecting the tension between America's growing economic power that pulled it toward global engagement and traditional resistance to foreign entanglements that pushed it toward withdrawal from international commitments.

📋 Complete Scoring Guidelines Summary

Short Answer Questions (3 points each)

Each part (A, B, C) worth 1 point, earned independently
Must use complete sentences (no outlines or bullet points)
"Describe" = provide relevant characteristics (more than just a term)
"Explain" = provide information about HOW or WHY something occurred
Minor grammatical errors acceptable if they don't obscure content
Content must be historically accurate and defensible

Document-Based Question (7 points)

Thesis (1 pt): Defensible thesis with line of reasoning, can be in intro or conclusion
Contextualization (1 pt): Broader context before/during/after period, more than a phrase
Evidence - Documents (2 pts): Use 3 docs content (1 pt) or support argument with 4+ docs (2 pts)
Evidence - Beyond Documents (1 pt): One specific historical evidence not in documents
Sourcing (1 pt): Explain POV/purpose/situation/audience relevance for 2+ documents
Complexity (1 pt): Sophisticated argument OR use all 7 docs OR source 4+ docs

Long Essay Question (6 points)

Thesis (1 pt): Defensible thesis with line of reasoning
Contextualization (1 pt): Broader context relevant to prompt
Evidence (2 pts): Two specific examples (1 pt) or use 2+ to support argument (2 pts)
Historical Reasoning (1 pt): Use comparison/causation/continuity-change to frame argument
Complexity (1 pt): Sophisticated argument with multiple themes/perspectives OR 4+ pieces of evidence

🎯 Expert Test-Taking Strategies

Time Management Strategy

SAQs (40 min total): 13 minutes each question. Budget 3-4 minutes per part. Don't write more than 3-4 sentences per part.
DBQ (60 min): 15 minutes reading/annotating documents + outlining. 45 minutes writing (10 min intro, 25 min body, 10 min conclusion)
LEQ (40 min): 5 minutes to read all options and outline your choice. 35 minutes writing. Leave 2 min to review.
Critical Rule: READ ALL LEQ OPTIONS FIRST before choosing! Pick the one you have the most evidence for.

SAQ Success Tips

Address ALL parts: If you skip Part C, you automatically lose that point
Be specific: Name names, dates, events. "Reformers wanted change" is too vague; "Jane Addams founded Hull House in 1889" is specific
Explain connections: Don't just list facts—explain HOW they answer the question
Stay in time period: Using evidence from 1850 for an 1820-1848 question won't earn points
Complete sentences matter: Bullet points will receive zero points even if content is correct

DBQ Mastery Approach

During Reading Period: Read prompt first. Then skim all 7 docs for main idea. Annotate with symbols (+/-/economic/social/etc). Group docs into 2-3 categories.
Thesis Strategy: Write thesis LAST (in your outline). After reading docs you'll know what argument you can support. Thesis should acknowledge complexity (change AND continuity, or different perspectives).
Contextualization Placement: First or second paragraph. Connect to broader trends that set up your argument.
Document Integration: Don't write one paragraph per document! Group docs thematically. Explain what document shows, then explain why it matters.
Source 4+ Documents: Plan which 2 you'll analyze deeply for sourcing point. Choose docs with clear POV or interesting audiences.
Outside Evidence: Identify 2-3 pieces while reading docs in case you forget one while writing.
Complexity Strategy: Easiest ways: (1) Explain continuity AND change, (2) Discuss multiple perspectives, (3) Source 4 documents

LEQ Excellence Formula

Choose Wisely: Pick the prompt where you remember the MOST specific evidence. Quality of evidence > quantity of general knowledge.
Thesis Craft: Should include your argument's categories or reasoning. Not just "X changed" but "X changed because of A, B, and C."
Evidence Standard: You need 2 specific pieces minimum for 1 point, but aim for 4+ to potentially earn complexity point.
Historical Reasoning: The prompt will suggest which to use. "Evaluate adaptation" suggests causation. "Compare" suggests comparison. "To what extent changed" suggests continuity/change. Structure entire essay around that reasoning.
Avoid Laundry Lists: Don't just list 10 facts. Develop 3-4 pieces of evidence thoroughly, explaining their significance.

🚫 Critical Mistakes to Avoid

Thesis = Restatement: "The government's role changed from 1932 to 1980" just repeats the prompt. Say HOW it changed.
Document Dumping: "Document 1 says... Document 2 says... Document 3 says..." Use docs to SUPPORT ARGUMENTS.
Missing Sourcing: Don't just say "This was written during WWII." Explain WHY that situation matters for your argument.
Vague Evidence: "Many reforms happened" or "People disagreed" gives you no points. Be specific!
Ignoring Prompt: If prompt asks about economic role, don't write entirely about social/cultural impacts.
No Argumentation: Essays must make arguments, not just describe. Every paragraph should support your thesis.
Time Mismanagement: Don't spend 30 minutes on one SAQ or you'll have no time for others.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

How many points is the AP US History FRQ section worth? ▼

The free-response section (Section II) is worth 60% of your total AP US History exam score. It consists of three SAQs (20%), one DBQ (25%), and one LEQ (15%). The maximum raw points are 9 for SAQs, 7 for DBQ, and 6 for LEQ, totaling 22 points. These are then converted to a scaled score combined with your multiple-choice section score.

What is the difference between DBQ and LEQ in APUSH? ▼

The DBQ (Document-Based Question) provides you with 7 documents that you must analyze and incorporate into your essay. It's worth 7 points and you have 60 minutes total (15 min reading, 45 min writing). The LEQ (Long Essay Question) has no documents provided—you rely entirely on your own historical knowledge. It's worth 6 points and should take 40 minutes. Both require a thesis, contextualization, and evidence, but the DBQ requires document analysis and sourcing while the LEQ requires clear historical reasoning (comparison, causation, or continuity/change).

How should I structure my APUSH DBQ essay? ▼

Introduction (2-3 paragraphs): Start with contextualization (broader historical background), then present your thesis (your argument answering the prompt). Body Paragraphs (3-5 paragraphs): Organize thematically, not document-by-document. Each paragraph should make one sub-argument supporting your thesis. Integrate documents as evidence (use 4+ for full credit), explain their significance, and analyze POV/purpose/situation/audience for at least 2 documents. Include your outside evidence (one specific example not from the documents). Conclusion (1 paragraph): Synthesize your argument and potentially demonstrate complexity by acknowledging counterarguments, explaining change AND continuity, or connecting to other time periods.

What are the scoring criteria for APUSH Short Answer Questions? ▼

Each SAQ is worth 3 points total, with one point available for each part (A, B, C). Points are earned independently—you can earn part A without earning part B. Part A typically asks you to describe or identify something, requiring more than just naming a term. Parts B and C usually ask you to explain how or why something occurred or is significant. You must use complete sentences—bullet points or outlines receive zero points. Typically, 2-3 well-developed sentences per part are sufficient. Your response must be historically accurate and contain specific details.

How do I earn the complexity point on the APUSH DBQ? ▼

The complexity point (also called the synthesis point) is earned by demonstrating sophisticated historical thinking. You can achieve this in several ways: (1) Explain multiple themes or perspectives to explore nuance in your argument, (2) Explain both continuity AND change or both cause AND effect related to the prompt, (3) Make relevant connections within and across time periods that strengthen your argument, (4) Use all 7 documents effectively to support your argument, or (5) Explain POV/purpose/situation/audience for 4 or more documents. The complexity must be woven into your argument, not just added as a phrase. It should feel integral to your essay, not tacked on.

What historical evidence should I use for the 1932-1980 economy DBQ? ▼

Strong outside evidence includes: New Deal programs (Social Security Act 1935, WPA, CCC, TVA, SEC), World War II mobilization (War Production Board, rationing, price controls), postwar programs (GI Bill, Employment Act of 1946, interstate highways), Great Society (Medicare/Medicaid 1965, Economic Opportunity Act, food stamps), regulatory agencies (EPA, OSHA in 1970s), economic crises (1970s stagflation, oil shocks), and political shifts (Reagan's 1980 campaign promising smaller government). Connect your evidence to the changing role of government in managing the economy, providing for citizens, or regulating business.

Should I answer Question 3 or Question 4 for the no-stimulus SAQ? ▼

Choose based on your content knowledge strengths. Question 3 (1607-1783) covers the colonial period through the American Revolution, focusing on political development in British North America, effects of the Seven Years' War, and colonial responses to debates about rights. Question 4 (1865-1945) spans Reconstruction through World War II, focusing on Reconstruction-era political developments, effects of Reconstruction's end, and group responses to federal government debates during the Progressive Era and New Deal. Pick whichever time period you've studied more recently or have clearer, more specific examples for. Both are structured similarly, so your choice should be purely based on content knowledge.

How do I analyze document POV, purpose, situation, or audience? ▼

Point of View (POV): The author's perspective shaped by their identity, position, or beliefs. Purpose: Why the document was created—to persuade, inform, justify, protest, etc. Historical Situation: The specific context of when/where the document was created. Audience: Who the document was intended to reach. The key is you must EXPLAIN WHY this sourcing element is relevant to your argument—don't just identify it. Example: "Document 5's purpose was to convince Americans to support conservative policies. Goldwater wrote this speech at a time when conservatives were organizing against the expansion of federal programs, and his rhetorical emphasis on freedom was designed to reframe the debate away from government effectiveness toward questions of individual liberty, demonstrating how the conservative movement challenged the liberal consensus of the 1950s-60s."

What time management strategy works best for APUSH FRQs? ▼

Section I, Part B (40 minutes total): Allocate 13 minutes per SAQ. Spend 3-4 minutes on each part (A, B, C). Don't write more than 3-4 sentences per part—quality over quantity. Section II (100 minutes total): DBQ (60 minutes): 15 minutes to read all documents, annotate them, identify themes, and outline your essay. 45 minutes to write (roughly 10 min intro, 25 min body paragraphs, 10 min conclusion/review). LEQ (40 minutes): 2-3 minutes to read ALL THREE options and select one. 5 minutes total to outline. 33-35 minutes to write. Always leave 2-3 minutes at the end to quickly review for obvious errors. The key is discipline—if you spend 25 minutes on SAQ #1, you won't have enough time for the others.

What are common mistakes to avoid on APUSH free-response questions? ▼

Top 10 Mistakes: (1) Restating the prompt as your thesis without making an argument, (2) Quoting or describing documents without analysis—explain what they prove!, (3) Forgetting contextualization or making it just one sentence, (4) Not addressing all parts of multi-part questions, (5) Only using 3 documents for the DBQ when you need 4 for full credit, (6) Providing evidence without connecting it to your argument, (7) Writing vague generalizations like "people wanted change" instead of specific facts, (8) Going outside the specified time period, (9) Using bullet points or outlines instead of complete sentences for SAQs, and (10) Poor time management leading to incomplete essays.

🚀 Ready to Master APUSH?

Access comprehensive study materials covering all 9 units of AP U.S. History, from Period 1 (1491-1607) through Period 9 (1980-Present). Get interactive flashcards, challenging practice quizzes, and detailed study notes designed by expert educators.

Start Studying Now →